• K. Urazbaev Westminster International University in Tashkent
Keywords: technology acceptance, e-portfolio, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude, intention to use technology


The aim of the research was to conduct quantitative analysis of mobile e-portfolio acceptance by pre-service teacher education program students. Technology Acceptance Model developed by Davis was used in the study to identify the influence of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude towards the use of e-portfolio on the intention to use it. 136 respondents from three different higher education institutions took part in the survey. The data obtained in the survey was analyzed by applying linear regression analysis. Findings of the research suggest that perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness and attitude to the use of e-portfolio have a significant impact on students’ intention to use the e-portfolio. Among them, attitude towards the use of e-portfolio was the most significant factor that influences the intention to use mobile e-portfolio. 

Author Biography

K. Urazbaev , Westminster International University in Tashkent



1.Abrami P., Barrett H. Directions for research and development on electronic portfolios //Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie. – 2005. – Т. 31. – №. 3.
2.Ayala J. I. Electronic portfolios for whom? //Educause Quarterly. – 2006. – Т. 29. – №. 1. – С. 1213.
3.Chen M. Y. et al. Why do individuals use eportfolios? //Journal of Educational Technology & Society. – 2012. – Т. 15. – №. 4. – С. 114-125.
4.Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology //MIS quarterly. – 1989. – С. 319-340.
5.Dillon A., Morris M. From" Can They?" to" Will They?" Extending usability to accommodate acceptance predictions //AMCIS 1998 Proceedings. – 1998. – С. 325.
6.Lorenzo G., Ittleson J. An overview of eportfolios. Educause Learning Initiative Paper 1: 2005. – 2005.
7.Heath M. Are You Ready to Go Digital?: The Pros and Cons of Electronic Portfolio Development //Library Media Connection. – 2005. – Т. 23. – №. 7. – С. 66.
8.Jafari A. Conceptualizing intelligent agents for teaching and learning //Educause Quarterly. – 2002. – Т. 25. – №. 3. – С. 28-34.
9.Ma X., Rada R. Building a web-based accountability system in a teacher education program //Interactive Learning Environments. – 2005. – Т. 13. – №. 1-2. – С. 93-119.
10. Shroff R. H., Deneen C. C., Ng E. M. W. Analysis of the technology acceptance model in examining students' behavioural intention to use an eportfolio system //Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. – 2011. – Т. 27. – №. 4.
11. Streiner D. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment. 2003; 80:99-103.
12. Tucker P. D. et al. The efficacy of portfolios for teacher evaluation and professional development: Do they make a difference? //Educational administration quarterly. – 2003. – Т. 39. – №. 5. – С. 572-602.
13. Wall K. et al. Developing digital portfolios: Investigating how digital portfolios can facilitate pupil talk about learning //Technology, Pedagogy and Education. – 2006. – Т. 15. – №. 3. – С. 261-273.
14. Young J. R. E-Portfolios Could Give Students a New Sense of Their Accomplishments //Chronicle of Higher Education. – 2002. – Т. 48. – №. 26.
15. Zainal-Abidin W., Uisimbekova A., Alias R. A. Post-implementation strategy for the adoption of eportfolio among students in a Malaysian public university //2011 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems. – IEEE, 2011.