EFFICIENCY OF PORK PRODUCTION AT DIFFERENT PERIODS OF PIGS REARING AND THEIR RESISTANCE

  • O. Yaremchuk Vinnytsia national agrarian university
Ключевые слова: pigs

Аннотация

It was found that sows fed by Hliutam 1M for 3 days from the second day of insemination had 96.6% fertility, it was by 13.3% more than in the control.

The feed additive effect on energy metabolism of piglets in the period of weaning from sows was studied. It was found that the supplement Humilid causes an increased glucose concentration, increased activity of alkaline phosphatase and creatine kinase within the physiological norm in the blood plasma of experimental group animals. These data indicate the intensification of energy metabolism and stimulation of phosphorylation processes under the feed additive influence of the addition. The obtained results are relevant for increasing the adaptability of piglets.

The efficiency of soybean meal was proved due to the increase of its relative amount in the structure of the diet, it leads to an increase in the average daily gain of live weight of pigs by 1 kg or more reducing the time of their fattening.

Resistance and productivity of replacement pigs brought from other farms of Vinnytsia region and reared in the industrial complex is genetically feasible and increases the resistance of offspring and their productivity.

Биография автора

O. Yaremchuk , Vinnytsia national agrarian university

 Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor

Литература

1.Agalakov A., Nazarkin G., Uhtverov M. Influence of housing conditions on the sows’ productivity. Pig breeding, 1985. No. 2. P. 7-8.
2.Vlizlo V.V., Fedoruk R.S., Makar I.A. Physiological and biochemical research methods in biology, animal husbandry and veterinary medicine. Lviv, 2004. 400 p.
3.Hryban V.H., Yefimov V.H., Rakytianskyi V.M. The effectiveness of the use of humic drugs in livestock and the mechanism of their action on the body. Scientific and technical bulletin of the State Research Control Institute of Veterinary Drugs and Feed Additives and the Institute of Animal Biology. Lviv, 2010. Vol. 11, No. 2-3. P. 402-405.
4.Ibatullin I.I., Panasenko Yu.O., Kononenko V.K. Workshop on feeding farm animals. К.: Vyshcha osvita, 2003. 432 p.
5. Kalashnikov A.P. On the norms and rations for feeding farm animals (regarding the detailed norms). Animal science. 2007. No. 5. С. 7-9.
6.Konopelko Yu.V. Intensification of pig reproduction technology. Industrial and pedigree pig breeding. 2005. No. 1. P.44.
7.Loban N.А. Large white breed of pigs: methods of improvement and use. Minsk: Businessoffset, 2004. 110 p.
8.Stepchenko L.M. Regulatory mechanisms of action of biologically active substances of humic nature on the body of productive poultry. Physiological Journal. 2010. Vol. 56, No. 2. P.306.
9.Kharenko M.I., Chernenko M.V. Biotechnology of pig breeding. К.: Vetinform, 1996. 216 p.
10.Sheremeta V.І. Reproductive capacity of sows with the use of biologically active drugs. Scientific Bulletin of National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine. 2009. Vol. 136. P. 210 – 214.
Опубликован
2021-01-21
Как цитировать
Yaremchuk , O. 2021. «EFFICIENCY OF PORK PRODUCTION AT DIFFERENT PERIODS OF PIGS REARING AND THEIR RESISTANCE ». EurasianUnionScientists 3 (12(81), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.31618/ESU.2413-9335.2020.3.81.1156.