АНАЛИЗ ПОЛИТИКИ В ОБЛАСТИ ПОСЛЕВУЗОВСКОГО ОБУЧЕНИЯ ВРАЧЕЙ В БОЛГАРИИ
Abstract
Health workers and the provision of doctors to the population require a thorough analysis of needs, which primarily depend on processes and trends at the European level that exert pressure and affect the sustainability of national health systems. Resource planning in Bulgaria depends on:
- the processes of changing the state system and related long-term health care reform. Processes at the national level directly form managerial, economic and legal problems in the development of the national system of clinical specialization of doctors. In recent years, the medical profession has lost its prestige, as a result of the long-term underestimation of expert human capital in the health care system as a whole, and the process of acquiring a clinical specialty by doctors.
- influence of the macro environment. The main problem is the demographic trend of the aging population in Europe, but other factors should be taken into account, such as working conditions in the health systems of member countries and the mobility of health managers. National health policy on the main cause of migration-the acquisition of a clinical specialty by doctors should traditionally follow the best management practices in our country and in other European countries, combined with the capabilities that today's generation has-technological support for medical practice, e-health and telemedicine. This, in turn, requires a transition to the next stage of development of the system of clinical specialization, regulation of new forms of medical training and qualification of doctors, adequate structures and funding.
It is necessary to take measures to transform the models of training and specialty acquisition in accordance with the changing socio-economic environment, constantly developing social relations related to professional implementation and international requirements for the quality of medical training, specialization and medical care of the population.
References
2.Закон за висшето образование, Обн. ДВ. бр.112 от 27 Декември 1995г, посл. изм. и доп. ДВ. бр.17 от 25 Февруари 2020г.
3.Закон за признаване на професионални квалификации, в сила от 08.02.2008 г. посл. доп. ДВ. бр.17 от 25 Февруари 2020г.
4.Йорданов Ю. Петрова З. Мотиви и мотивация за миграция на лекарите. БЛС „Европейските етични стандарти и българската медицина”, София; 2013:119-146.
5. Кондева С. Развитие на националната система за клинична специализация на лекарите - институционални, правни и финансови аспекти. Автореферат, СУ, 2018.
6.Линдгрен С. Как можем да постигнем и гарантираме качеството на ефективното продължаващо развитие?
7.МЗ (https://www.mh.government.bg/bg/novini/parlamenta ren-kontrol/otgovor-na-ministra-na-zdraveopazvaneto-29-03-3/ посл. посетен на 24.10.2020);
8.Наредба № 1 от 22 януари 2015 г. за придобиване на специалност в системата на здравеопазването. Обн. ДВ. бр.7 от 27 Януари 2015г., посл. изм. и доп. ДВ. бр.54 от 16 Юни 2020г.
9.Радева С. Адаптация за практикуване на акушерската професия в болнични условия. Автореферат, Варна, 2020.
CC BY-ND
A work licensed in this way allows the following:
1. The freedom to use and perform the work: The licensee must be allowed to make any use, private or public, of the work.
2. The freedom to study the work and apply the information: The licensee must be allowed to examine the work and to use the knowledge gained from the work in any way. The license may not, for example, restrict "reverse engineering."
2. The freedom to redistribute copies: Copies may be sold, swapped or given away for free, in the same form as the original.