THE INFLUENCE OF THE AGENDA ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF COWS OF DIFFERENT LACTATIONS UNDER DIFFERENT KEEPING REGIMES

  • O. Kucherenko
  • R. Varpikhovskyi
Keywords: productivity, hopes, routine, lactation, microclimate, constant, variable, mode

Abstract

It was found that during lactation the milking of cows in the experimental groups at the constant regime were at the level of 4639 kg of milk, which is more than at the variable regime by 159.8 kg or 3.57%. As a result, the cost of feed in the variable mode of the day per 1 kg of milk was 1.38 feed units, and at constant - 1.10 feed units, which is less than 0.28 feed units or 20.3%. The constant daily routine reduced labor costs in milk production by 9.7%, and by 1 quintal of milk - 34.2%.

It is presented that it is inexpedient to violate the daily routine, which leads to the loss of marketable milk by more than 3.6%.

Author Biographies

O. Kucherenko

graduate student

R. Varpikhovskyi

candidate of agricultural sciences

References

1.Departmental standards of technological design (2005). Livestock enterprises (complexes, farms, small farms), VNTP APK 01.05. K.: Ministry of Agrarian Education and Science of Ukraine. 110 s.
2.Departmental standards of technological design (2006). Manure removal, treatment, preparation and use system: VNTP APK 09.06. K.: Ministry of Agrarian Education and Science of Ukraine. 101 s.

UDC 633.113.3

3.Polyova О.L. (2010). Efficiency of energysaving animals. Monograph. Zhytomyr: Ruta. 179 s.
4.Polyovyi L.V., Yaremchuk O.S., Varpikhovsky R.L. (2010). Improving the conditions of tethered cows of the Ukrainian black-spotted dairy breed. Modern problems of selection, breeding and hygiene of animals. Coll. Science. works of Vinnytsia NAU. Vinnytsia. Vip. 5 (45). Pp. 122-125.
5.Polyovyi L.V., Yaremchuk O.S., Varpikhovsky R.L., Kovalenko V.O., Bryzhaty B.M. Machine for fixing animals. Patent of Ukraine № 68648. Bull. № 7 dated 11.04.2012.
6.Polyovyi L.V., Yaremchuk O.S., Polyova O.L. (2008). Efficiency of use of production areas in livestock premises depending on technological solutions. Scientific Bulletin of LNUVMBT named after S.Z. Gzhytsky. Lviv. Volume 10, №4 (39). Pp. 221-225.
7.Yaremchuk O., Varpikhovsky R., Deren V. (2015). Energy saving of production from cows of different breeds. Livestock of Ukraine. Kiev. № 6. pp. 14-17.
8.Yaremchuk O.S., Gotsulyak S.V. (2019). Adaptation of Ukrainian black-and-white dairy cows to the conditions of industrial technology. Agricultural science and food technology. Vip. 1 (104) pp. 146-152.
9.Yaremchuk O.S., Zakharenko M.O., Kurbatova I.M. (2010). Ethological and sanitary-hygienic aspects of monitoring of livestock enterprises. Collection of scientific works of Vinnytsia National Agrarian University. Vinnytsia: Series: Agricultural sciences. Vip. 5. pp. 152-154.
10. Yaremchuk O.S. (2019). Improving the elements of milk production technology and microclimate control on low-capacity farms. Wschodnioeuropejskie Czasopismo Naukowe (East European Scientific Journal). Warsaw, Poland. № 11 (51). S. 14-24.
Published
2021-01-18
How to Cite
Kucherenko, O., and R. Varpikhovskyi. 2021. “THE INFLUENCE OF THE AGENDA ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF COWS OF DIFFERENT LACTATIONS UNDER DIFFERENT KEEPING REGIMES ”. EurasianUnionScientists 3 (12(81), 4-8. https://doi.org/10.31618/ESU.2413-9335.2020.3.81.1157.