EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL MORPHOLOGY OF LOWER JAW MOLARS BASED ON CBCT DATA
Keywords:
assessment of morphology
Abstract
Over the past 5 years, our knowledge of the true anatomy of the root canal has significantly increased thanks to the data of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Microcomputed Tomography.
References
1.Ahmed HMA, Versiani MA, De-Deus G, Dummer PMH. A new system for classifying root and root canal morphology. Int Endod J. 2017 Aug;50(8):761-770.
2.Sousa-Neto MD, Silva-Sousa YC et al. Root canal preparation using micro-computed tomography analysis: a literature review. Braz Oral Res. 2018 Oct 18;32.
3.Siqueira Junior JF, Rôças IDN, MarcelianoAlves MF, Pérez AR, Ricucci D. Unprepared root canal surface areas: causes, clinical implications, and therapeutic strategies. Braz Oral Res. 2018 Oct 18;32.
4.Leoni GB, Versiani MA, Pécora JD, Sousa-Neto MD. Micro-computed tomographic analysis of the root canal morphology of mandibular incisors. J Endod. 2014 May;40(5):710-6.
5.Guimarães LS, Gomes CC, Marceliano-Alves MF, Cunha RS, Provenzano JC, Siqueira JF Jr. Preparation of oval-shaped canals with TRUShape and reciproc systems: a micro-computed tomography study using contralateral premolars. J Endod. 2017 Jun;43(6):1018-22.
6.Zuolo ML, Zaia AA, Belladonna FG, Silva EJ, Souza EM, Versiani MA et al. Micro-CT assessment of the shaping ability of four root canal instrumentation systems in oval-shaped canals. Int Endod J. 2018;51(5):564-71.
7.Siqueira Junior JF, Pérez AR, Marceliano-Alves MF, Provenzano JC, Silva SG, Pires FR et ak. What happens to unprepared root canal walls: a correlative analysis using micro-computed tomography and histology/scanning electron microscopy. Int. Endod. J. 2018 May;51(5):501-8.
8.Lacerda MF, Marceliano-Alves MF, Pérez AR, Provenzano JC, Neves MA, Pires FR et al. Cleaning and shaping oval canals with 3 instrumentation systems: a correlative micro-computed tomographic and histologic study. J Endod. 2017 Nov; 43(11):1878-84.
9.Pereira RD, Brito-Júnior M, Leoni GB, Estrela C, Sousa-Neto MD. Evaluation of bond strength in single-cone fillings of canals with different crosssections. Int Endod J. 2017 Feb;50(2):177-83.
10. Arias A, Paqué F, Shyn S, Murphy S, Peters OA. Effect of canal preparation with TRUShape and Vortex rotary instruments on three-dimensional geometry of oval root canals. Aust Endod J. 2018 Apr;44(1):32-9.
11. Mohamed Mohamed Elashiry , Shehab Eldin Saber, Salma Hasan Elashry, Comparison of Shaping Ability of Different Single-File Systems Using Microcomputed Tomography, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent, 2019).
12. Hamid HR, Gluskin AH, Peters OA, Peters CI. Rotary versus reciprocation root canal preparation: initial clinical quality assessment in a novice clinician cohort. J Endod 2018; 44 (08) 1257-1262.
13. Sousa-Neto MD, Silva-Sousa YC, MazziChaves JF. et al. Root canal preparation using microcomputed tomography analysis: a literature review. Braz Oral Res 2018; 32 (suppl 1).
14. Neves MAS, Provenzano JC, Roças IN, Siqueira JF Jr. Clinical antibacterial effectiveness of root canal preparation with reciprocating singleinstrument or continuously rotating multi-instrument systems. J Endod. 2016 Jan;42(1):25-9.
15. Marinho AC, Martinho FC, Gonçalves LM, Rabang HR, Gomes BP. Does the Reciproc file remove root canal bacteria and endotoxins as effectively as multifile rotary systems? Int Endod J. 2015 Jun;48(6):542-8.
16. Bao P, Shen Y, Lin J, Haapasalo M. In vitro efficacy of XP-endo Finisher with 2 different protocols on biofilm removal from apical root canals. J Endod. 2017 Feb;43(2):321-5.
17. Shah DY, Wadekar SI, Dadpe AM, Jadhav GR, Choudhary LJ, Kalra DD. Canal transportation and centering ability of protaper and self-adjusting file system in long oval canals: an ex-vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis. J Conser Dent 2017 Mar-Apr;20(2):105-9.
18. Maria Cristina Carvalho, Mario Luis Zuolo et al. Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher in the reduction of bacterial load in oval-shaped root canals. Braz. oral res. vol.33 São Paulo 2019 Epub May 16, 2019.
19. Espir CG, Nascimento-Mendes CA, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Freire LG, Gavini G, Tanomaru-Filho M. Counterclockwise or clockwise reciprocating motion for oval root canal preparation: a micro-CT analysis. Int Endod J. 2018 May; 51(5):541-8.
20. De-Deus G, Silva EJNL, Vieira VTL, Belladonna FG, Elias CN, Plotino G et al. Blue thermomechanical treatment optimizes fatigue resistance and flexibility of the reciproc files. J Endod. 2017 Mar;43(3):462-6.
21. Silva EJNL, Belladonna FG, Zuolo AS, Rodrigues E, Ehrhardt IC, Souza EM et al. Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher and XP-endo Finisher R in removing root filling remnants: a microCT study. Int Endod J. 2018.
22. Andrade FB, Arias MP, Maliza AG, Duarte MA, Graeff MS, Amoroso-Silva PA et al. A new improved protocol for in vitro intratubular dentinal bacterial contamination for antimicrobial endodontic tests: standardization and validation by confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015 NovDec;23(6):591-8.
23. Zuolo ML, De-Deus G, Belladonna FG, Silva EJ, Lopes RT, Souza EM et al. Micro-computed tomography assessment of dentinal micro-cracks after root canal preparation with TRUShape and Selfadjusting File Systems. J Endod. 2017 Apr; 43(4):619-622.
24. Azim AA, Piasecki L, da Silva Neto UX, Cruz ATG, Azim KA. XP Shaper, a novel adaptive core rotary instrument: micro-computed tomographic analysis of its shaping abilities. J Endod. 2017 Sep;43(9):1532-8.
25. Elnaghy AM, Mandorah A, Elsaka SE. Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and file agitation on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a comparative study. Odontology. 2017 Apr;105(2):178-83.
26. De Carlo Bello M, Pillar R, Mastella Lang P, Michelon C, Abreu da Rosa R, Souza Bier CA., Incidence of Dentinal Defects and Vertical Root Fractures after Endodontic Retreatment and Mechanical Cycling. Iran Endod J. 2017; 12 (4):502-7.
27. Elham Khoshbin, Zakiyeh Donyavi et al. The Effect of Canal Preparation with Four Different Rotary Systems on Formation of Dentinal Cracks: An In Vitro
Evaluation. Iran Endod J. 2018 Spring; 13(2): 163–168.
2.Sousa-Neto MD, Silva-Sousa YC et al. Root canal preparation using micro-computed tomography analysis: a literature review. Braz Oral Res. 2018 Oct 18;32.
3.Siqueira Junior JF, Rôças IDN, MarcelianoAlves MF, Pérez AR, Ricucci D. Unprepared root canal surface areas: causes, clinical implications, and therapeutic strategies. Braz Oral Res. 2018 Oct 18;32.
4.Leoni GB, Versiani MA, Pécora JD, Sousa-Neto MD. Micro-computed tomographic analysis of the root canal morphology of mandibular incisors. J Endod. 2014 May;40(5):710-6.
5.Guimarães LS, Gomes CC, Marceliano-Alves MF, Cunha RS, Provenzano JC, Siqueira JF Jr. Preparation of oval-shaped canals with TRUShape and reciproc systems: a micro-computed tomography study using contralateral premolars. J Endod. 2017 Jun;43(6):1018-22.
6.Zuolo ML, Zaia AA, Belladonna FG, Silva EJ, Souza EM, Versiani MA et al. Micro-CT assessment of the shaping ability of four root canal instrumentation systems in oval-shaped canals. Int Endod J. 2018;51(5):564-71.
7.Siqueira Junior JF, Pérez AR, Marceliano-Alves MF, Provenzano JC, Silva SG, Pires FR et ak. What happens to unprepared root canal walls: a correlative analysis using micro-computed tomography and histology/scanning electron microscopy. Int. Endod. J. 2018 May;51(5):501-8.
8.Lacerda MF, Marceliano-Alves MF, Pérez AR, Provenzano JC, Neves MA, Pires FR et al. Cleaning and shaping oval canals with 3 instrumentation systems: a correlative micro-computed tomographic and histologic study. J Endod. 2017 Nov; 43(11):1878-84.
9.Pereira RD, Brito-Júnior M, Leoni GB, Estrela C, Sousa-Neto MD. Evaluation of bond strength in single-cone fillings of canals with different crosssections. Int Endod J. 2017 Feb;50(2):177-83.
10. Arias A, Paqué F, Shyn S, Murphy S, Peters OA. Effect of canal preparation with TRUShape and Vortex rotary instruments on three-dimensional geometry of oval root canals. Aust Endod J. 2018 Apr;44(1):32-9.
11. Mohamed Mohamed Elashiry , Shehab Eldin Saber, Salma Hasan Elashry, Comparison of Shaping Ability of Different Single-File Systems Using Microcomputed Tomography, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent, 2019).
12. Hamid HR, Gluskin AH, Peters OA, Peters CI. Rotary versus reciprocation root canal preparation: initial clinical quality assessment in a novice clinician cohort. J Endod 2018; 44 (08) 1257-1262.
13. Sousa-Neto MD, Silva-Sousa YC, MazziChaves JF. et al. Root canal preparation using microcomputed tomography analysis: a literature review. Braz Oral Res 2018; 32 (suppl 1).
14. Neves MAS, Provenzano JC, Roças IN, Siqueira JF Jr. Clinical antibacterial effectiveness of root canal preparation with reciprocating singleinstrument or continuously rotating multi-instrument systems. J Endod. 2016 Jan;42(1):25-9.
15. Marinho AC, Martinho FC, Gonçalves LM, Rabang HR, Gomes BP. Does the Reciproc file remove root canal bacteria and endotoxins as effectively as multifile rotary systems? Int Endod J. 2015 Jun;48(6):542-8.
16. Bao P, Shen Y, Lin J, Haapasalo M. In vitro efficacy of XP-endo Finisher with 2 different protocols on biofilm removal from apical root canals. J Endod. 2017 Feb;43(2):321-5.
17. Shah DY, Wadekar SI, Dadpe AM, Jadhav GR, Choudhary LJ, Kalra DD. Canal transportation and centering ability of protaper and self-adjusting file system in long oval canals: an ex-vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis. J Conser Dent 2017 Mar-Apr;20(2):105-9.
18. Maria Cristina Carvalho, Mario Luis Zuolo et al. Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher in the reduction of bacterial load in oval-shaped root canals. Braz. oral res. vol.33 São Paulo 2019 Epub May 16, 2019.
19. Espir CG, Nascimento-Mendes CA, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Freire LG, Gavini G, Tanomaru-Filho M. Counterclockwise or clockwise reciprocating motion for oval root canal preparation: a micro-CT analysis. Int Endod J. 2018 May; 51(5):541-8.
20. De-Deus G, Silva EJNL, Vieira VTL, Belladonna FG, Elias CN, Plotino G et al. Blue thermomechanical treatment optimizes fatigue resistance and flexibility of the reciproc files. J Endod. 2017 Mar;43(3):462-6.
21. Silva EJNL, Belladonna FG, Zuolo AS, Rodrigues E, Ehrhardt IC, Souza EM et al. Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher and XP-endo Finisher R in removing root filling remnants: a microCT study. Int Endod J. 2018.
22. Andrade FB, Arias MP, Maliza AG, Duarte MA, Graeff MS, Amoroso-Silva PA et al. A new improved protocol for in vitro intratubular dentinal bacterial contamination for antimicrobial endodontic tests: standardization and validation by confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015 NovDec;23(6):591-8.
23. Zuolo ML, De-Deus G, Belladonna FG, Silva EJ, Lopes RT, Souza EM et al. Micro-computed tomography assessment of dentinal micro-cracks after root canal preparation with TRUShape and Selfadjusting File Systems. J Endod. 2017 Apr; 43(4):619-622.
24. Azim AA, Piasecki L, da Silva Neto UX, Cruz ATG, Azim KA. XP Shaper, a novel adaptive core rotary instrument: micro-computed tomographic analysis of its shaping abilities. J Endod. 2017 Sep;43(9):1532-8.
25. Elnaghy AM, Mandorah A, Elsaka SE. Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and file agitation on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a comparative study. Odontology. 2017 Apr;105(2):178-83.
26. De Carlo Bello M, Pillar R, Mastella Lang P, Michelon C, Abreu da Rosa R, Souza Bier CA., Incidence of Dentinal Defects and Vertical Root Fractures after Endodontic Retreatment and Mechanical Cycling. Iran Endod J. 2017; 12 (4):502-7.
27. Elham Khoshbin, Zakiyeh Donyavi et al. The Effect of Canal Preparation with Four Different Rotary Systems on Formation of Dentinal Cracks: An In Vitro
Evaluation. Iran Endod J. 2018 Spring; 13(2): 163–168.
Published
2021-04-15
How to Cite
Grigorev, S., D. Sorokoumova, and P. Kudinov. 2021. “EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL MORPHOLOGY OF LOWER JAW MOLARS BASED ON CBCT DATA”. EurasianUnionScientists 2 (3(84), 45-49. https://archive.euroasia-science.ru/index.php/Euroasia/article/view/643.
Section
Article
CC BY-ND
A work licensed in this way allows the following:
1. The freedom to use and perform the work: The licensee must be allowed to make any use, private or public, of the work.
2. The freedom to study the work and apply the information: The licensee must be allowed to examine the work and to use the knowledge gained from the work in any way. The license may not, for example, restrict "reverse engineering."
2. The freedom to redistribute copies: Copies may be sold, swapped or given away for free, in the same form as the original.
