POETRY, PHILOSOPHY, TECHNOLOGY IN THE LIGHT OF CULTUROLOGY: DIALOGUE STRATEGY
Abstract
In the article, on the interdisciplinary methodological basis of the classical semiotics of culture and cultural comparative studies, supplemented by the developments of Lacanism and post-Lacanian psychoanalysis of the Ljubljana school, information aesthetics and tranzaesthetics, critical theory, French structuralism and poststructuralism, a strategy of dialogue between poetry and philosophy as the phenomena of traditional Logos in postmoderism is developed. ... The main problem of the modern poetic word is the loss of ontological adequations and spiritual implications by the text as a result of the inclusion of artistic creativity in the cyberspace of global digital multicultural capitalism. A comparative analysis of the projects of globalism and anti-globalism has demonstrated the priority of commercial culture as a prestigious social model for the formation of the poet's symbolic capital and network promotion. The orientation of the free market towards the sponsor's occupation of poetic creativity increasingly deprives poetry of the semantic invariants of authentic civilizational memory, which is eroded by trends in branding, advertising, and image, and is transformed into a souvenir, simulacrum, ersatz, and trademark. The only guarantor of the actualization of the basic cultural meanings of poetry is traditionalism, but its often grotesque, ultra-conservative and nostalgic character is not able to maintain the competitiveness of the tradition, its attractiveness for the younger generation and vivid personal subjectivity. A harmonious balance between traditionalism and postmodernism in poetry is possible if new technologies are used as forms of presentation and means of promoting the classical poetic tradition in the modern world, while maintaining the primacy of the goal for poetry, in relation to which the “creativity” of managerial entrepreneurship is a secondary means. We regard poetry as a point of semiotic intersection of a static sign in space (syntagma) and dynamic meaning in time (paradigm). Inside this point, in the zero phoneme, the author resides, regaining integrity, continuity, essence and selfhood instead of gaping, alienation and lack due to the correct correlation of the ontological goals of poetry and its ontic cases. Poetry in this context is a kind of a formula for the harmony of the metonymy of the real-symbolic language of culture and the metaphor of its ideal imaginary meanings. To find harmony between tradition and innovation, metaphysics and dialectics, synchronicity and diachrony, the gene code of culture and a historically labile cultural image is capable of culturology as a science based on philosophy (ontology and axiology), philology (hermeneutics and journalism), social sciences.
References
Braten, S. (1981). Quality of Interaction and Participation: On Model Power in Industrial Democracy and Computer Nerworks. Applied System and Cybernetics, 1, 191-200 [in English].
Hall, S. (1989). Encoding, decoding. The Cultural
Studies Reader. London: Routledge, 90-103 [in
English].
McLuhan, М. (1967). The Medium is the Massage. Retried from: http://www.mcluhan.ru/themedium-is-the-massage/ [in English].
Bad'yu, A. (1999). Apostol Pavel. Obosnovanie universalizma [Apostle Paul. Justification of universalism]. M.; SPb.: Moskovskii filosofskii fond. Universitetskaya kniga [in Russian].
Bibler, V.S. (1999). Filosof i poet [Philosopher and poet]. Retried from: https://www.bibler.ru/bid_filosof.php [in Russian].
Bibler, V. S. (2001). Veshch' i vest' [Thing and message]. Voprosy filosofii, 6, 107-135 [in Russian].
Burrio, N. (2004). Globalizatsiya i appropriatsiya [Globalization and Appropriation]. Moscow Art
Magazine, 56. Retried from:
http://moscowartmagazine.com/issue/33/article/613 [in Russian].
Delez, Zh. & Gvattari, F. (2005). Rizoma
(«Tysyacha plato», glava pervaya) [Rizoma (A Thousand Plateaus, Chapter One)]. Vostok, 11/12.
Retried from: https://amp.ru.googleinfo.cn/8377040/1/tysyacha-plato.html [in Russian].
Zhizhek, S. (2019). Kak naslazhdat'sya posredstvom Drugogo. Kul'turnaya logika mnogonatsional'nogo kapitalizma [How to enjoy through the Other. The cultural logic of multinational capitalism]. SPb.: Aleteiya [in Russian].
Zhizhek, S. (2016). Real'nost' Virtual'nogo [he reality of the Virtual]. Retried from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDI1EKSAfQ4
[in Russian].
Levinas, (1998). E. Vremya i Drugoi. Gumanizm drugogo cheloveka [Semiosphere. Inside thinking worlds. Culture and explosion]. SPb.: Vysshaya religiozno filosofskaya shkola [in Russian].
Lotman, Yu. (2000). Semiosfera. Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov. Kul'tura i vzryv [Semiosphere.
Inside thinking worlds. Culture and explosion]. SPb.: Iskusstvo SPB [in Russian].
Lotman, Yu. Pamyat' v kul'turologicheskom osveshchenii [Memory in cultural illumination]. Retried from: http://yanko.lib.ru/books/cultur/lotmanselection.htm#_Toc509600942 [in Russian].
Manovich, L. (2010). Budushchee izobrazheniya [The future of the image]. Retried from:: http://mediadepo.blogspot.com/2009/04/blogpost_03.html [in Russian].
Pirs, Ch. (2000). Logicheskie osnovaniya teorii znakov [Logical foundations of the theory of signs]. SPb.: Laboratoriya metafizicheskikh issledovanii filosofskogo fakul'teta SPbGU; Aleteiya [in Russian].
Ril'ke, P.M. (1974). Izbrannaya lirika [Selected Lyrics]. M.: Molodaya gvardiya [in Russian].
Sossyur, F. de. (1999). Kurs obshchei lingvistiki [General linguistics course]. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 1999 [in Russian].
Khaidegger, M. (1993). Vremya i bytie: Stat'i i vystupleniya [Time and Being: Articles and Speeches]. M.: Respublika [in Russian].
Khaidegger, M. (1991). Gel'derlin i sushchnost' poezii [Helderlin and the essence of poetry]. Logos. Filosofsko-literaturnyi zhurnal, 1, 37-47 [in Russian].
Khyubner, B. (2000). Proizvol'nyi etoc i prinuditel'nost' estetiki [The arbitrary itc and the compulsion of aesthetics]. Minsk: Propilei [in Russian].
Yakobson, R.O. (1985). Izbrannye raboty [Selected works]. M.: Progress [in Russian].
CC BY-ND
A work licensed in this way allows the following:
1. The freedom to use and perform the work: The licensee must be allowed to make any use, private or public, of the work.
2. The freedom to study the work and apply the information: The licensee must be allowed to examine the work and to use the knowledge gained from the work in any way. The license may not, for example, restrict "reverse engineering."
2. The freedom to redistribute copies: Copies may be sold, swapped or given away for free, in the same form as the original.