TO THE QUESTION OF IMPROVING THE METHODOLOGY OF FORECASTING BANKRUPTCY SMALL BUSINESS

  • E. Ivanova Siberian State Industrial University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31618/ESU.2413-9335.2020.7.78.1028
Keywords: crisis, bankruptcy forecasting, methods for assessing the probability of bankruptcy, logistic regression

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to identify the possibilities of applying of existing models for estimation of the probability of bankruptcy in domestic and foreign practice to predict the risk of default of small enterprises. The relevance of this research is due to the role the small businesses play in the social-economic development of regions and the country as a whole. The relationship between individual indicators of the region’s social-economic situation and the level of bankrupt enterprises in the total number of enterprises is shown. The differentiation of Russian regions in terms of social-economic development (in Siberian Federal district as an example) are demonstrated, the desirability of including of regional factor in model of bankruptcy forecasting is highlighted. Based on the dialectical approach, comparison, abstraction, analysis and synthesis, a conceptual approach to creation of logistic regression model for predicting the bankruptcy of small enterprises is described.

References

1. Иванова Е.В., Ефремкова Т.И. Методологические предпосылки развития модели прогнозирования банкротства // Вестник Алтайской академии экономики и права. 2020. № 4 (часть 3). С. 336-343. [Ivanova E.V., Efremkova T.I. Methodological prerequisites for the development of the bankruptcy forecasting model. Vestnik Altayskoy academy economicy i prava. 2020; (4): 336-343. (In Russ).]. http://vaael.ru/ru/article/view?id=1092.
2. Altman E.I. Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance. 1968; 23 (4): 589–609.
3. Altman E.I., Haldeman R., Narayanan P. ZETATM analysis. A new model to identify bankruptcy risk of corporations. Journal of Banking and Finance. 1977; 1 (1): 29–54.
4. Taffler R. J. Forecasting company failure in the UK using discriminant analysis and financial ratio data. Journal of Royal Statistical Society. Series A. 1982; 14 (3): 342–358.
5. Edmister R. O. An Empirical Test of Financial Ratio Analysis for Small Business Failure Prediction. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 1972; 7 (2): 1477–1493.
6. Blum M. Failing company discriminant analysis. Journal of Accounting Research. 1974; 12 (1): 1–25.
7. Zavgren C.V. Assessing the vulnerability to failure of American industrial firms: a logistic analysis. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 1985; 12 (1): 19–45.
8. Begley J., Ming J., Watts S. Bankruptcy classification errors in the 1980’s: An empirical analysis of Altman's and Ohlson's models. Review of Accounting Studies. 1996; 1 (4): 267–284.
9. Gilbert L.R., Menon K., Schwartz K.B. Predicting bankruptcy for firms in financial. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 1990; 17 (1): 161– 171.
10. Ward T.J. Cash flow information and the prediction of financially distressed mining, oil and gas firms: A comparative study. Journal of Applied Business Research. 1994; 10 (3): 78–86.
11. Регионы России. Социальноэкономические показатели. 2019: Стат. сб. / Официальный сайт Федеральной службы государственной статистики. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/210/document/13204.
12. Единый федеральный ресурс сведений о банкротстве. URL: https://bankrot.fedresurs.ru/DebtorsSearch.aspx?attem pt=1.
13. Хайдаршина Г.А. Эффективность современных методов оценки риска банкротства предприятий в российской практике финансового менеджмента: logit- и SVM-модели // Экономические науки. 2008. № 44. С. 300-304 [Haydarshina G.A. Effeciency of modern methods for assessing the risk of bankruptcy of enterprises in the Russian practice of financial management: logit- and SVM-models. Economicheskie nauki. 2008; (44): 300304 (In Russ).].
14. Beck T., Demirgüç‐Kunt A., Maksimovic, V. Financial and legal constraints to growth: Does firm size matter? The Journal of Finance. 2005; 60(1): 137– 177.
15. Ramalho J. J. S., Da Silva J. V. A two‐part fractional regression model for the financial leverage decisions of micro, small, medium and large firms. Quantitative Finance. 2009; (5): 621–636
16. Mateev M., Poutziouris P., Ivanov K. On the determinants of SME capital structure in Central and Eastern Europe: A dynamic panel analysis. Research in International Business and Finance. 2013; 27(1): 28– 51.
17. Gill A., Biger N., Pai C., Bhutani S. The determinants of structure in the service industry: Evidence from United States. The Open Business Journal, 2009; (2): 48–53.
18. Gupta J., Gregoriou A., Ebrahimi T. Empirical comparison of hazard models in predicting SMEs failure. Quantitative Finance, 2018; 18(3): 437–466.
Published
2020-10-30
How to Cite
Ivanova, E. 2020. “TO THE QUESTION OF IMPROVING THE METHODOLOGY OF FORECASTING BANKRUPTCY SMALL BUSINESS”. EurasianUnionScientists 7 (9(78), 36-41. https://doi.org/10.31618/ESU.2413-9335.2020.7.78.1028.
Issue
Vol. 7 No. 9(78) (2020): EURASIAN UNION OF SCIENTISTS №78
Section
Article

CC BY-ND

A work licensed in this way allows the following:

1. The freedom to use and perform the work: The licensee must be allowed to make any use, private or public, of the work.

2. The freedom to study the work and apply the information: The licensee must be allowed to examine the work and to use the knowledge gained from the work in any way. The license may not, for example, restrict "reverse engineering."

2. The freedom to redistribute copies: Copies may be sold, swapped or given away for free, in the same form as the original.